On Tuesday 29 September 2009, Øyvind Harboe wrote: > Overloading meaning of integers rarely leads to anything good. > Even if it was done this way before, doesn't make it good design...
Well enough; but that'd be a lot bigger change. > I'd rather see that with *no* "-exepected-id"'s listed, no check happens. I'd rather interpret that one as ... no IDs expected, this TAP doesn't support the IDCODE instruction. After all, there *does* need to be a way to say that such a TAP is expected in the scan chain, and to report errors when such a tap is missing ... or is unexpectedly present. - Dave _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
