> > >> Is this the expected behaviour now, as previous versions > would fail silently > >> if no id was given. > > > > I changed that when I changed it to make sure it didn't > > drop messages in various cases. I think it's better to > > get the config files updated, so startup verification > > can do a better job, but I might be persuaded otherwise. > > It should at least be *possible* not to check the ID's even > if one is strongly encouraged(kind word and a gun) to > add them... > > Who knows what boards are out there? >
I tend to agree that we need to handle the case of no id - as per previous versions. Cheers Spen _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
