On Thu, 2009-06-25 at 14:55 +0200, Michael Bruck wrote: > On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 17:34, Zach Welch<z...@superlucidity.net> wrote: > > On Wed, 2009-06-24 at 16:00 +0200, Michael Bruck wrote: > >> > >> The libusb improvements certainly sound interesting, however no one > >> has stepped forward to implement them or to pay someone to implement > >> them. They may or may not also require some reverse engineering plus > >> extensive profiling that would make them more time-consuming than the > >> wrapper. So they don't seem like a near-term solution at the moment. > > > > Others have stated emphatically that the specifications are open and > > available for the developers to take a whack at replacing their library. > > Unless it is incomplete or inaccurate, the matter should be > > straightforward enough. :) Heh. > > I have not seen a spec that documents the USB endpoints and how to > interact with them. But if someone has a link to that it would be nice > if that person could post that.
Indeed. I took a look around their site today, and I can only find chip specifications -- no protocol documents. They may be there, but I gave up after a few pointless PDF downloads. Cheers, Zach _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
