Michael Bruck wrote: > If a third party develops a libftdi.dll replacement then there is no > reason a user can not use that replacement. The GPL license that > applies to the user does not restrict at all what he does with the > code or binary as long as he does not distribute binaries of it. > > Obviously to put the dll wrapper wrapper under a GPL+exceptions > license it would have to be written from scratch rather than just > copy&pasting GPLed libftdi header files (although one could ask the > libfti author to re-license his/her files). > Yes, another developer could produce such a library. There might be GPL Gray areas, etc
But the discussion would need to be some place else, not on this list. :) Tom _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
