Zach Welch <z...@superlucidity.net> writes:

> On Wed, 2009-06-24 at 11:18 +0200, Magnus Lundin wrote:
>> Simple project for a CS student.
>> 
>> A wrapper with a libftdi interface calling libftd2xx, as a project using 
>> a LGPL  license
>> 
>> So any user can take their binary copy of OpenOCD linked against libftdi 
>> and simply replace  the libftdi dll file, no need to play with system 
>> files or drivers.
>> 
>> Is  such a library  illegal ? Who would have standing to complain ?
>
> You are doing it to circumvent the GPL.  I think that is illegal.

IMO "circumvent" is indistinguishable from "comply with". That is, it is
a way of achieving some goals while remaining within the terms of the
GPL.

> You would be contravening this copyright holder's intention, which would
> make you liable for any possible infringement that I could show.

Now it you you who wants to ignore the actual terms of the license, and
substitute your own intentions. 

> Furthermore, I think individuals can be held liable for "inducing"
> infringement, which is where IANAL becomes useful in some respects.

Have you considered a career with the RIAA?...

[...]


-- 

John Devereux
_______________________________________________
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development

Reply via email to