On Sunday 21 June 2009, Duane Ellis wrote: > I would like to see this exception *documented* so that it does not > expand, or continue beyond this exact situation.
The way to "document" this is with a change to the license, signed on to by *everyone* holding any copyright on the code. Any previous "exception" was for development purposes only, not for distribution. You can tell that by the way there is (cough) ... no exception in the written license. > Then we can move on. We can also move on by just accepting that the license is what it is, and working with that. If someone wants to conduct a parallel effort to contact each developer and get them to publicly approve a change in the licensing terms for their contributions, then by all means do that. Preferably with the work done off-list so it doesn't clutter up mailboxes of people trying to make actual technical contributions. But lacking such an effort, all the flamage is just pure annoyance. - Dave _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
