On Sunday 31 May 2009, Michael Bruck wrote: > The 'struct foo_s' syntax is code bloat that obscures the actual > algorithms. 'foo_t' is shorter.
Disagree about obscuring. And "shorter" doesn't matter here. If I see "foo_t" I have no idea what kind of thing it is. If I see a "struct foo" there's no such confusion. Ergo, "foo_t" has obscured. _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
