On Sunday 31 May 2009, Michael Bruck wrote: > > If I see "foo_t" I have no idea what kind of thing it is. > > If I see a "struct foo" there's no such confusion. > > > > Ergo, "foo_t" has obscured. > > Yes, I read that argument on this list before. By this logic most C++ > code in existence is doomed.
Well, it's been a few years since I've written C++ ... but I'll say that the C++ style guides I used were good about making clear if/when something was a class, so it wasn't "doomed" like that. In almost all cases ... the exception being "smart pointers", which at this point ISTR added up to "lose". On the grounds that they obfuscated too much. ;) _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
