On Dec 12, 2008, at 1:18 AM, Spencer Oliver wrote:
Any other opinions on this? Has BerliOS responded? RickAs yet all is quiet, but then berlios are never quick to respond.I cannot see this changing however, searching through old requests we arenot the first to ask.so this leaves us with what layout to use, we have to make sure the svn pagepoints to the openocd/trunk, eg. svn://svn.berlios.de/openocd/trunk the only option for this is to keep trunk where it is now and move the tags/branches back to their original position.the issue comes with what todo with zy1000, i am still in favour of having this as a separate project. But keeping it where it is causes no harm. wecould always add extra svn instructions to the openocd homepage - http://openocd.berlios.de on how to obtain zy1000 etc. Cheers Spen
Later today I am going to move things around such that the repository has the following layout:
trunk/ tags/ branches/ zy1000/ trunk/ tags/ branches/I'm not enamored of having the zy1000 contents in the repo, but there is no technical reason it must leave. I would like Øyvind to consider moving the zy1000 contents to a separate repository at some future date. In terms of collaboration and merging, having the zy1000 contents elsewhere just means that zy1000 developers submit patches to OpenOCD just like everyone else instead of working in a branch within the same repo but in a different top-level project.
-- Rick Altherr kc8...@kc8apf.net"He said he hadn't had a byte in three days. I had a short, so I split it with him."
-- Unsigned
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
