On Nov 26, 2008, at 9:41 AM, Øyvind Harboe wrote:

Does that mean that you wish to have a tcl script (perhaps named
obsolete.tcl) that implements the obsolete syntax using the new syntax?

I guess what I'm saying is that if someone submits such a patch, I'll
certainly commit it.

However, I don't suggest documenting or promoting it. Much. It is then an
example of what users can write themselves if they so wish to.


That would provide a simple upgrade path for users while still excising the old syntax from the main code base. It is also clear to the end users that
they are using an obsolete syntax.

Are there other syntax changes that should be made before 1.0? If so, what
are they?

Don't know. If we commit a first obsolete.tcl and there is interest in it,
I'll certainly apply followup patches.


Do you wish me to update the patch to include the obsolete.tcl idea?

If you are willing to put this together then I'll certainly commit it.




--
Øyvind Harboe
http://www.zylin.com/zy1000.html
ARM7 ARM9 XScale Cortex
JTAG debugger and flash programmer


Where does this leave the original patch to remove obsolete syntax then?

--
Rick Altherr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

"He said he hadn't had a byte in three days. I had a short, so I split it with him."
 -- Unsigned



Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

_______________________________________________
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development

Reply via email to