> On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 8:41 PM, Spen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>> Any objections? >>> >> >> Personally i would prefer to keep the existing behaviour. > > I guess you mean that you are speaking on behalf of what users > would want? That is a VERY good argument !
> The problem is that the behaviour is *unexpected*. Why "unexpected"? > If there is a reset init script, then why isn't it run by default as it > is for other tools? OpenOCD is a bit off the beaten track here having > this config option. If there is a reset init script and a reset_init command, of course the init script should be run. If I do a reset, there are many possible scenarios where I want to keep as much processor state as possible, so reset halt is a very reasonable bahiviour unless a different default reset behaviour is specified. > Minimally I'd like to require all scripts in the target library to > have reset_init as the reset behaviour. Please, let us try to make core OpenOCD as stable and versatile as possible, and not demand default behaviour. Please refrain from the "require". It is perfectly OK to write a target library with reset_init as reset bahaviour. It is a very different thing to "require" rthis behaviour. Just my two cents. Regards Magnus _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
