On Tue, 29 Oct 2024 16:15:45 GMT, Nir Lisker <nlis...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> That isn't an example of "everything on one line". That's effectively the >> "switch case NNNN:, on a line by itself", which is defensible, although >> still not preferred. >> >> Anyway, what you currently have is what I called option 1, and it doesn't >> seem very readable. I'll still leave it up to you, but please consider the >> comments made in this thread. > > I'm not sure why this is a counter argument. It's not used in the JDK or > JavaFX. I still think option 2 is better, but if we don't enforce a style > then it's your choice. I think this discussion is not productive. Can we focus on essentials please? ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/1604#discussion_r1821207809
