On Tue, 29 Oct 2024 15:16:59 GMT, Kevin Rushforth <k...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> This is a bit silly. You have an opening brace, you should be indenting as
>> you would in every other case when an opening brace appears and you break
>> off the line. So unless there is a **really** good reason to suddenly not
>> do so that has to do with readability, I think this is an really odd stand
>> to take.
>
> I agree that especially when each switch case is on a single line, indenting
> is the most sensible thing to do. It's a little more defensible to treat the
> standard switch `case NNNN:`, on a line by itself, as a label which is placed
> at the same indentation level as the switch itself (but even indenting it is
> more consistent).
>
> Taking this example:
>
> Option 1 - don't indent:
>
>
> String s = switch(val) {
> case 1 -> "one";
> case 2 -> "two";
> // ...
> default -> "unknown";
> };
>
> Option 2 - indent:
>
>
> String s = switch(val) {
> case 1 -> "one";
> case 2 -> "two";
> // ...
> default -> "unknown";
> };
>
>
> It seems pretty clear that the second option is easier to read. Virtually
> _all_ such uses in the JDK, and all uses up to now in JavaFX use the second
> pattern.
>
> @andy-goryachev-oracle care to make a counter-argument?
Sure:
String s = switch(val) {
case 1 ->
"one";
case 2 ->
"two";
default ->
"unknown";
};
-------------
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/1604#discussion_r1821048760
