On Fri, 9 Aug 2024 11:20:55 GMT, John Hendrikx <jhendr...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> +1 for `StyleConverter.WithReconstructionSupport`
>>
>> maybe use a shorter name, like
>>
>> `StyleConverter.WithReconstruction`
>
> Clear, thanks MIchael. I would suggest `Reconstructable` as the name, which
> seems more inline with interface naming (especially `Interpolatable`). Reads
> nice also:
>
> if (converter instanceof Reconstructable r) { ... }
But the converter is not reconstructable (in comparison to Interpolatable,
which is something the marked types actually are).
-------------
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/1522#discussion_r1711480351
