On Thu, 25 Jul 2024 14:54:46 GMT, Kevin Rushforth <k...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> modules/javafx.graphics/src/test/java/test/javafx/scene/CssStyleHelperTest.java
>> line 699:
>>
>>> 697:
>>> 698: // Note: on Windows, the message is using inconsistent line
>>> endings (sometimes Windows, sometimes Linux)
>>> 699: // so I've stripped it.
>>
>> would looking for substrings be a better solution? for example:
>>
>>
>> contains("Caught java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Loop detected in
>> *.root{") &&
>> contains("while resolving '-fx-base'' while calculating value for
>> '-fx-background-color' from rule '*.pane' in stylesheet"
>
> Yeah, this seems less fragile. If we ever run into a problem because the
> message changes slightly, we could consider such a change in the future.
I'm not sure what way is being advocated. It seems both of you favor a
contains check?
For me, I always verify strings intended for user consumption completely so
that any change would fail a test. If the change is intended (like fixing the
missing line feeds), then the string can be fixed at the same time. With the
complete string, the test also serves as a way to see the full output (which in
this case, is a bit abysmal, so perhaps we should follow up with a fix).
-------------
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/1505#discussion_r1701968325
