On Tue, 16 Apr 2024 16:18:09 GMT, eduardsdv <d...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> how silly of me! you are right, of course. thank you for clarification. > > You are welcome, partner :-). > It was a surprise for me too. > It's strange, why it needs to be an unmodifiable collection. good question! admittedly, it might be easier to control what happens as a result of a change if the only mutator is `pseudoClassStateChanged()` method. ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/1434#discussion_r1567664132
