> Modified the resize algorithm to work well with fractional scale, thanks for > deeper understanding of the problem thanks to @hjohn and @mstr2 . > > It is important to note that even though the constraints are given by the > user in unsnapped coordinates, they are converted to snapped values, since > the snapped values correspond to the actual pixels on the display. This > means the tests that validate honoring constraints should, in all the cases > where (scale != 1.0), assume possibly error not exceeding (1.0 / scale) (I > think).
Andy Goryachev has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains ten additional commits since the last revision: - whitespace - Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into 8299753.resize - review comments - review comments - whitespace - removed obsolete tester - Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into 8299753.resize - cleanup - new algorithm ------------- Changes: - all: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/1156/files - new: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/1156/files/2e06578e..908203cd Webrevs: - full: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jfx&pr=1156&range=03 - incr: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jfx&pr=1156&range=02-03 Stats: 6565 lines in 125 files changed: 3405 ins; 2951 del; 209 mod Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/1156.diff Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jfx.git pull/1156/head:pull/1156 PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/1156
