> Modified the resize algorithm to work well with fractional scale, thanks for > deeper understanding of the problem thanks to @hjohn and @mstr2 . > > It is important to note that even though the constraints are given by the > user in unsnapped coordinates, they are converted to snapped values, since > the snapped values correspond to the actual pixels on the display. This > means the tests that validate honoring constraints should, in all the cases > where (scale != 1.0), assume possibly error not exceeding (1.0 / scale) (I > think).
Andy Goryachev has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision: review comments ------------- Changes: - all: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/1156/files - new: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/1156/files/8eab7970..2e06578e Webrevs: - full: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jfx&pr=1156&range=02 - incr: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jfx&pr=1156&range=01-02 Stats: 62 lines in 5 files changed: 56 ins; 1 del; 5 mod Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/1156.diff Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jfx.git pull/1156/head:pull/1156 PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/1156
