> Modified the resize algorithm to work well with fractional scale, thanks for > deeper understanding of the problem thanks to @hjohn and @mstr2 . > > It is important to note that even though the constraints are given by the > user in unsnapped coordinates, they are converted to snapped values, since > the snapped values correspond to the actual pixels on the display. This > means the tests that validate honoring constraints should, in all the cases > where (scale != 1.0), assume possibly error not exceeding (1.0 / scale) (I > think).
Andy Goryachev has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains 25 additional commits since the last revision: - tolerance - Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into 8299753.resize - undo merge - no new api - Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into 8299753.resize - cleanup - using snap inner space api - Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into 8299753.resize - Merge branch 'ag.8311527.snap.inner' into 8299753.resize - tests - ... and 15 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/compare/141f8575...abd9af92 ------------- Changes: - all: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/1156/files - new: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/1156/files/df87de91..abd9af92 Webrevs: - full: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jfx&pr=1156&range=05 - incr: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jfx&pr=1156&range=04-05 Stats: 1296 lines in 35 files changed: 1019 ins; 116 del; 161 mod Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/1156.diff Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jfx.git pull/1156/head:pull/1156 PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/1156
