On Thu, 10 Nov 2022 19:14:12 GMT, Michael Strauß <mstra...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Changes requested by angorya (Author). > > @andy-goryachev-oracle > Snapping doesn't necessarily imply integer coordinates or sizes. The reason > is that we're snapping to _pixels_, not integers. For example, with 200% > scale, every other pixel will have a .5 coordinate. It's also important to > not confuse snapping with rounding to integers because integer coordinates > might not even fall on pixel boundaries for some scaling factors. @mstr2 : You are right, I wasn't aware of scale. Snapping code looks like `Math.round(value * scale) / scale;`, so I take the 'whole integer' words back. Sorry for the confusion. Having said that, my earlier comment is still valid - if snapToPixel==true, the final location and sizes must go through snap*() methods. And the earlier example is also valid, assuming scale=1.0. ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/910
