Milan Jurik wrote: > in long term you will need to do the switch anyway as it is unlikely > somebody will dedicate full-time taking care about improvements and also > sync with OpenSSH forever as SUN did. Otherwise "IllumosSSH" will loose > contact with the latest versions.
I think that's actually a deeper issue, because it doesn't just apply to the intentionally-forked SSH implementation, but rather to all of the Illumos source. The parts that aren't owned by someone and actively maintained may have trouble. I don't see with SSH would be special in this regard. > It would be much better to identify the needed parts and deliver them as > patch on top of OpenSSH releases. That's probably a bit easier said than done. The original Sun SSH team intentionally forked the source because there were substantial high-level design differences, particularly in the area of privilege separation. Meaningful source patches for this sort of thing are probably at least as hard to manage as are the sources themselves -- meaning that I believe you'd have no real benefit to keeping diffs instead. -- James Carlson 42.703N 71.076W <carls...@workingcode.com> _______________________________________________ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
