There is a merge conflict when trying automatic cherry-pick, so the patch may 
need the other 2 or part of them.


> On May 5, 2016, at 11:36 AM, Jamo Luhrsen <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> can we rebase and merge (just 38369) and get a respin and let the tests
> run, just as a head start; in case the answer from Joezf is that we don't
> need the other patches?
> 
> JamO
> 
> On 05/05/2016 11:33 AM, Abhijit Kumbhare wrote:
>> In that case - may be better to wait till tomorrow for Jozef to respond 
>> whether the other two are needed (& safe) - since Luis only tested
>> with https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/38369/ (and found that it 
>> worked).
>> 
>> On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 11:24 AM, Thanh Ha <[email protected] 
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> 
>>    Looks like that patch depends on 2 patches that need to be merged before:
>> 
>>    https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/38111/15
>>    https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/37661/19
>> 
>>    Do we need them? if so then please +2 those patches too. If not then 
>> patch 38369 needs to be rebased so that it doesn't depend on other
>>    unsubmitted patches.
>> 
>>    Regards,
>>    Thanh
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>    On 5 May 2016 at 14:17, Abhijit Kumbhare <[email protected] 
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> 
>>        Since the TSC decision is to respin, I have +2'ed 
>> https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/38369/ - but the branch is locked. 
>> 
>>        Thanh - can you please merge it?
>> 
>>        On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 6:03 AM, Colin Dixon <[email protected] 
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> 
>>            Noted. I'll bring this up on the TSC call today. Is it possible 
>> to have somebody who deeply understands the bug and it's consequences
>>            attend the meeting?
>> 
>>            Also, have we established if we know of any external consumers of 
>> the Lithium plugin-in in Beryllium?
>> 
>>            --Colin
>> 
>> 
>>            On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 6:33 PM, An Ho <[email protected] 
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> 
>>                Hi Colin,
>> 
>>                Our latest build [1] has a critical blocker bug in 
>> OPENFLOWPLUGIN [2] related to the OpenFlow Li Plugin Cluster test failures.  
>> This
>>                is a regression that may affect end users who run the 
>> controller with the new OpenFlow Li Plugin in Beryllium.  A patch [3] has 
>> been
>>                created to fix the issues and is currently awaiting review.  
>> More details can be found on the status page [4].  We have two options:
>> 
>>                Option #1: After the patch is merged, we schedule a respin of 
>> the build to incorporate the patches fixing the OPENFLOWPLUGIN critical
>>                bug, then have projects sign off on the newly respun build.  
>> This may have the potential of further delay of the release of Beryllium SR2.
>>                Option #2: Release Beryllium SR2 with the known 
>> OPENFLOWPLUGIN regression.
>> 
>>                Best Regards,
>>                An Ho
>> 
>>                [1] 
>> https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Simultaneous_Release:Beryllium_Release_Plan#Beryllium_SR2_Download
>>                [2] https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5523
>>                [3] https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/38369/
>>                [4] 
>> https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Simultaneous_Release/Beryllium/SR2/Status
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>        _______________________________________________
>>        release mailing list
>>        [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>        https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/release
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> TSC mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/tsc
>> 
> _______________________________________________
> TSC mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/tsc

_______________________________________________
openflowplugin-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/openflowplugin-dev
  • Re: [openflow... Abhijit Kumbhare
    • Re: [ope... Jamo Luhrsen
      • Re: ... Luis Gomez
        • ... Abhijit Kumbhare
          • ... An Ho
            • ... Abhijit Kumbhare
              • ... Jozef Bacigal -X (jbacigal - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco)
                • ... Thanh Ha
                • ... Abhijit Kumbhare

Reply via email to