In that case - may be better to wait till tomorrow for Jozef to respond
whether the other two are needed (& safe) - since Luis only tested with
https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/38369/ (and found that it worked).

On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 11:24 AM, Thanh Ha <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Looks like that patch depends on 2 patches that need to be merged before:
>
> https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/38111/15
> https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/37661/19
>
> Do we need them? if so then please +2 those patches too. If not then patch
> 38369 needs to be rebased so that it doesn't depend on other unsubmitted
> patches.
>
> Regards,
> Thanh
>
>
>
> On 5 May 2016 at 14:17, Abhijit Kumbhare <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Since the TSC decision is to respin, I have +2'ed
>> https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/38369/ - but the branch is
>> locked.
>>
>> Thanh - can you please merge it?
>>
>> On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 6:03 AM, Colin Dixon <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Noted. I'll bring this up on the TSC call today. Is it possible to have
>>> somebody who deeply understands the bug and it's consequences attend the
>>> meeting?
>>>
>>> Also, have we established if we know of any external consumers of the
>>> Lithium plugin-in in Beryllium?
>>>
>>> --Colin
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 6:33 PM, An Ho <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Colin,
>>>>
>>>> Our latest build [1] has a critical blocker bug in OPENFLOWPLUGIN [2]
>>>> related to the OpenFlow Li Plugin Cluster test failures.  This is a
>>>> regression that may affect end users who run the controller with the new
>>>> OpenFlow Li Plugin in Beryllium.  A patch [3] has been created to fix the
>>>> issues and is currently awaiting review.  More details can be found on the
>>>> status page [4].  We have two options:
>>>>
>>>> Option #1: After the patch is merged, we schedule a respin of the build
>>>> to incorporate the patches fixing the OPENFLOWPLUGIN critical bug, then
>>>> have projects sign off on the newly respun build.  This may have the
>>>> potential of further delay of the release of Beryllium SR2.
>>>> Option #2: Release Beryllium SR2 with the known OPENFLOWPLUGIN
>>>> regression.
>>>>
>>>> Best Regards,
>>>> An Ho
>>>>
>>>> [1]
>>>> https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Simultaneous_Release:Beryllium_Release_Plan#Beryllium_SR2_Download
>>>> [2] https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5523
>>>> [3] https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/38369/
>>>> [4]
>>>> https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Simultaneous_Release/Beryllium/SR2/Status
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> release mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/release
>>
>>
>
_______________________________________________
openflowplugin-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/openflowplugin-dev
  • Re: [openflow... Abhijit Kumbhare
    • Re: [ope... Jamo Luhrsen
      • Re: ... Luis Gomez
        • ... Abhijit Kumbhare
          • ... An Ho
            • ... Abhijit Kumbhare
              • ... Jozef Bacigal -X (jbacigal - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco)
                • ... Thanh Ha
                • ... Abhijit Kumbhare

Reply via email to