can we rebase and merge (just 38369) and get a respin and let the tests
run, just as a head start; in case the answer from Joezf is that we don't
need the other patches?

JamO

On 05/05/2016 11:33 AM, Abhijit Kumbhare wrote:
> In that case - may be better to wait till tomorrow for Jozef to respond 
> whether the other two are needed (& safe) - since Luis only tested
> with https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/38369/ (and found that it 
> worked).
> 
> On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 11:24 AM, Thanh Ha <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> 
>     Looks like that patch depends on 2 patches that need to be merged before:
> 
>     https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/38111/15
>     https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/37661/19
> 
>     Do we need them? if so then please +2 those patches too. If not then 
> patch 38369 needs to be rebased so that it doesn't depend on other
>     unsubmitted patches.
> 
>     Regards,
>     Thanh
> 
> 
> 
>     On 5 May 2016 at 14:17, Abhijit Kumbhare <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> 
>         Since the TSC decision is to respin, I have +2'ed 
> https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/38369/ - but the branch is locked. 
> 
>         Thanh - can you please merge it?
> 
>         On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 6:03 AM, Colin Dixon <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> 
>             Noted. I'll bring this up on the TSC call today. Is it possible 
> to have somebody who deeply understands the bug and it's consequences
>             attend the meeting?
> 
>             Also, have we established if we know of any external consumers of 
> the Lithium plugin-in in Beryllium?
> 
>             --Colin
> 
> 
>             On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 6:33 PM, An Ho <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> 
>                 Hi Colin,
> 
>                 Our latest build [1] has a critical blocker bug in 
> OPENFLOWPLUGIN [2] related to the OpenFlow Li Plugin Cluster test failures.  
> This
>                 is a regression that may affect end users who run the 
> controller with the new OpenFlow Li Plugin in Beryllium.  A patch [3] has been
>                 created to fix the issues and is currently awaiting review.  
> More details can be found on the status page [4].  We have two options:
> 
>                 Option #1: After the patch is merged, we schedule a respin of 
> the build to incorporate the patches fixing the OPENFLOWPLUGIN critical
>                 bug, then have projects sign off on the newly respun build.  
> This may have the potential of further delay of the release of Beryllium SR2.
>                 Option #2: Release Beryllium SR2 with the known 
> OPENFLOWPLUGIN regression.
> 
>                 Best Regards,
>                 An Ho
> 
>                 [1] 
> https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Simultaneous_Release:Beryllium_Release_Plan#Beryllium_SR2_Download
>                 [2] https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5523
>                 [3] https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/38369/
>                 [4] 
> https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Simultaneous_Release/Beryllium/SR2/Status
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>         _______________________________________________
>         release mailing list
>         [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>         https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/release
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> TSC mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/tsc
> 
_______________________________________________
openflowplugin-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/openflowplugin-dev
  • Re: [openflow... Abhijit Kumbhare
    • Re: [ope... Jamo Luhrsen
      • Re: ... Luis Gomez
        • ... Abhijit Kumbhare
          • ... An Ho
            • ... Abhijit Kumbhare
              • ... Jozef Bacigal -X (jbacigal - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco)
                • ... Thanh Ha
                • ... Abhijit Kumbhare

Reply via email to