On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 10:31 AM, Richard Purdie <richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > On Fri, 2016-02-05 at 10:22 -0800, Khem Raj wrote: >> On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 9:32 AM, Mike Crowe <m...@mcrowe.com> wrote: >> > On Tue, 2016-02-02 at 14:49 +0000, Mike Crowe wrote: >> > On Tue, 2016-02-02 at 21:04 +0000, Mike Crowe wrote: >> > > > I've compile-tested qemux86 and qemuarm for core-image-sato. >> > > > qemumips >> > > > is building now. >> > >> > Since then I've collected enough patches to make "bitbake world" >> > build >> > successfully for qemux86, qemuarm, qemuppc and qemumips. qemux86-64 >> > is >> > building now. The recipes that needed fixing to explicitly set >> > EXTRA_OEMAKE = "-e MAKEFLAGS=" were: >> > >> > meta/recipes-bsp/apmd/apmd_3.2.2-15.bb >> > meta/recipes-bsp/libacpi/libacpi_0.2.bb >> > meta/recipes-bsp/pciutils/pciutils_3.4.1.bb >> > meta/recipes-connectivity/openssl/openssl.inc >> > meta/recipes-devtools/dmidecode/dmidecode_3.0.bb >> > meta/recipes-devtools/fdisk/gptfdisk_1.0.1.bb >> > meta/recipes-devtools/perl/perl-native_5.22.1.bb >> > meta/recipes-devtools/perl/perl_5.22.1.bb >> > meta/recipes-extended/ed/ed_1.9.bb >> > meta/recipes-extended/iputils/iputils_s20151218.bb >> > meta/recipes-extended/pigz/pigz.inc >> > meta/recipes-extended/stat/stat_3.3.bb >> > meta/recipes-extended/sysklogd/sysklogd.inc >> > meta/recipes-extended/unzip/unzip_6.0.bb >> > meta/recipes-gnome/gtk-theme-torturer/gtk-theme-torturer_git.bb >> > meta/recipes-support/ptest-runner/ptest-runner_2.0.bb >> > >> > I will submit patches for these shortly. >> >> then there are other layers besides OE-Core where this will be >> needed. >> so phase it right so it doesnt cause land slide work for other layers > > How do we do that? > > Obviously I can merge the above into OE-Core and then there is just the > final bitbake.conf patch. How long do we need to wait for other layers > to sort this out though?
hard problem, it just makes it longer for adopting a release thats the effect. the only solution is to fix the issues. Or phase in with backward compatibility these kind of stuff can be treated like ABI of OE-Core IMO > > I'm facing this dilemma with a few patches atm... > > Cheers, > > Richard > -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
