On Tue, 2016-02-02 at 14:49 +0000, Mike Crowe wrote: > > > > [snip] Set EXTRA_OEMAKE = "" in bitbake.conf
On Tuesday 02 February 2016 at 16:01:14 +0000, Richard Purdie wrote: > > > Which architectures did you test? Often, x86 is a bad choice here and > > > we'd need something cross (arm/mips/ppc) to ensure it really is doing > > > the right things. We also need to assess a bit more than just sato. > > > We can run this up on the autobuilder and see what happens. On Tue, 2016-02-02 at 21:04 +0000, Mike Crowe wrote: > > I've compile-tested qemux86 and qemuarm for core-image-sato. qemumips > > is building now. Since then I've collected enough patches to make "bitbake world" build successfully for qemux86, qemuarm, qemuppc and qemumips. qemux86-64 is building now. The recipes that needed fixing to explicitly set EXTRA_OEMAKE = "-e MAKEFLAGS=" were: meta/recipes-bsp/apmd/apmd_3.2.2-15.bb meta/recipes-bsp/libacpi/libacpi_0.2.bb meta/recipes-bsp/pciutils/pciutils_3.4.1.bb meta/recipes-connectivity/openssl/openssl.inc meta/recipes-devtools/dmidecode/dmidecode_3.0.bb meta/recipes-devtools/fdisk/gptfdisk_1.0.1.bb meta/recipes-devtools/perl/perl-native_5.22.1.bb meta/recipes-devtools/perl/perl_5.22.1.bb meta/recipes-extended/ed/ed_1.9.bb meta/recipes-extended/iputils/iputils_s20151218.bb meta/recipes-extended/pigz/pigz.inc meta/recipes-extended/stat/stat_3.3.bb meta/recipes-extended/sysklogd/sysklogd.inc meta/recipes-extended/unzip/unzip_6.0.bb meta/recipes-gnome/gtk-theme-torturer/gtk-theme-torturer_git.bb meta/recipes-support/ptest-runner/ptest-runner_2.0.bb I will submit patches for these shortly. > > We've been running with the previous version of the patch with our code > > for a while but now I look more closely that solution didn't have > > anywhere near as wide an impact so I'll switch us over to using these > > patches. That will runtime-test a few real mips and arm targets (and > > even x86 and x86-64 to a limited extent) but only with our customised > > set of packages. On Tuesday 02 February 2016 at 22:41:25 +0000, Richard Purdie wrote: > Thanks. Please do mention what tests have passed/failed just so I can > build some idea of the risk of the patch and decide if/as/when the > right time to merge it is. I've not yet done any more runtime tests. I hope to get the change into our tree tonight so everything gets rebuilt with it over the weekend and I can test next week. > > > A post to the architecture list is probably needed so everyone knows > > > this is happening (or at least being considered). I hope to send such a post later today. Mike. -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
