On Tue, 2016-02-02 at 14:49 +0000, Mike Crowe wrote: > bitbake.conf currently contains: > > EXTRA_OEMAKE = "-e MAKEFLAGS=" > > Back in November[1] I submitted a patch that allowed this default > value to be overridden without affecting anything else that was > appended to it. I received feedback that the default value was no > longer useful and that it would be good to get rid of it. > > So, this patch series fixes the two recipes that still appear to be > relying on the previous default and then makes the default > EXTRA_OEMAKE = "". After these changes core-image-sato builds > successfully for me (although I have not run it.) > > Mike. > > [1] http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2015-No > vember/112393.html
This is a pretty major change and we likely need a bit more of an idea of impact. Which architectures did you test? Often, x86 is a bad choice here and we'd need something cross (arm/mips/ppc) to ensure it really is doing the right things. We also need to assess a bit more than just sato. We can run this up on the autobuilder and see what happens. A post to the architecture list is probably needed so everyone knows this is happening (or at least being considered). I do worry how much of meta-oe may be affected by this. Martin: Any opinion on this? Cheers, Richard -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
