On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 7:49 AM, Matt Madison <matt@madison.systems> wrote:
> OK, I'll rework the patch to fix PACKAGE_EXTRA_ARCHS and rebase off
> Martin's changes.

Martin's latest patch series resolved the problem for me with no
additional changes needed.  Thanks, Martin!

>
> -Matt
>
> On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 7:17 AM, Mark Hatle <mark.ha...@windriver.com> wrote:
>> On 12/7/15 8:01 AM, Burton, Ross wrote:
>>>
>>> On 6 December 2015 at 18:22, Matt Madison <matt@madison.systems
>>> <mailto:matt@madison.systems>> wrote:
>>>
>>>     Close, but not quite, I think.  It doesn't look like it addresses the
>>>     ordering mismatch that occurs due to the -vfp include being processed
>>>     before the -neon include, resulting vfpv4 preceding neon in
>>>     ARMPKGSFX_FPU when both are enabled.
>>>
>>>
>>> Martin's patch is in my ross/mut branch so will be in master soon, can you
>>> rebase these patches please?
>>>
>>> Ross
>>>
>>>
>>
>> I would prefer we fix the package extra arch, and leave the ARMPKGSFX_FPU 
>> alone.
>>  I believe that order is correct.
>>
>> --Mark
-- 
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

Reply via email to