On 6 December 2015 at 18:22, Matt Madison <matt@madison.systems> wrote:
> Close, but not quite, I think. It doesn't look like it addresses the > ordering mismatch that occurs due to the -vfp include being processed > before the -neon include, resulting vfpv4 preceding neon in > ARMPKGSFX_FPU when both are enabled. > Martin's patch is in my ross/mut branch so will be in master soon, can you rebase these patches please? Ross
-- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core