On 12/7/15 8:01 AM, Burton, Ross wrote: > > On 6 December 2015 at 18:22, Matt Madison <matt@madison.systems > <mailto:matt@madison.systems>> wrote: > > Close, but not quite, I think. It doesn't look like it addresses the > ordering mismatch that occurs due to the -vfp include being processed > before the -neon include, resulting vfpv4 preceding neon in > ARMPKGSFX_FPU when both are enabled. > > > Martin's patch is in my ross/mut branch so will be in master soon, can you > rebase these patches please? > > Ross > >
I would prefer we fix the package extra arch, and leave the ARMPKGSFX_FPU alone. I believe that order is correct. --Mark -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
