On Thu, 2014-02-20 at 15:41 +0000, Damian, Alexandru wrote: > I would think against it, because
> - it's very inefficient to send a Skipped event for each missed task > than to collect all the data and send it in one shot > - it's faster to send the event from the sstate.bbclass than to return > the task ids and then call again a python function to generate the > sstate file names - basically replicating the sstate.bbclass code in > bitbake > - the queueTaskSkipped event has a different semantic than what we > need here to return a whole batch of data; creating a new event type > from scratch is a bit pointless since the inheritance would need to be > broken > - knotty can receive MetadataEvents just as well as sceneTaskSkipped > event, or any variation of it I guess I'd like to understand which information from this even you're particularly interested in? Do I understand correctly that you want the actual filenames attempted? Cheers, Richard _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
