On 11/08/2013 04:18 PM, Richard Purdie wrote:
On Fri, 2013-11-08 at 16:10 +0800, wenzong fan wrote:
On 11/07/2013 07:12 PM, Burton, Ross wrote:
On 7 November 2013 11:03,  <wenzong....@windriver.com> wrote:
From: Wenzong Fan <wenzong....@windriver.com>

Just ship these sources to their own dbg packages instead of udev-dbg:

      libudev* -> libudev-dbg
      gudev*   -> libgudev-dbg
      others   -> udev-dbg

Why do this?  Multiple -dbg packages could make sense in a recipe
which builds a multi-gigabyte -dbg package (such as webkit) but what's
the rationale for doing this in udev?

Actually I don't know clear about why it needs three -dbg packages,
looks they have been there since very early commits of udev. I suspect
that udev/libudev/libgudev are independent each other, so they are
shipped into different packages (base/-dev/-dbg). This patch only ships
their source code to -dbg packages accordingly.

We don't support multiple -dbg packages and this looks like an error.

Ok, another patch for removing the extra -dbg packages has been sent with subject:

    udev: remove libudev-dbg and libgudev-dbg

Thanks
Wenzong


Cheers,

Richard



_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

Reply via email to