On 11/08/2013 04:18 PM, Richard Purdie wrote:
On Fri, 2013-11-08 at 16:10 +0800, wenzong fan wrote:
On 11/07/2013 07:12 PM, Burton, Ross wrote:
On 7 November 2013 11:03, <wenzong....@windriver.com> wrote:
From: Wenzong Fan <wenzong....@windriver.com>
Just ship these sources to their own dbg packages instead of udev-dbg:
libudev* -> libudev-dbg
gudev* -> libgudev-dbg
others -> udev-dbg
Why do this? Multiple -dbg packages could make sense in a recipe
which builds a multi-gigabyte -dbg package (such as webkit) but what's
the rationale for doing this in udev?
Actually I don't know clear about why it needs three -dbg packages,
looks they have been there since very early commits of udev. I suspect
that udev/libudev/libgudev are independent each other, so they are
shipped into different packages (base/-dev/-dbg). This patch only ships
their source code to -dbg packages accordingly.
We don't support multiple -dbg packages and this looks like an error.
What about the -dev packages?
So the correct fix is removing below configs, at least -dbg configs, right?
+ FILES_libudev = "${base_libdir}/libudev.so.*"
+ FILES_libudev-dbg = "${base_libdir}/.debug/libudev.so.*"
+ FILES_libudev-dev = "${includedir}/libudev.h ${libdir}/libudev.so
${libdir}/libudev.la \
${libdir}/libudev.a ${libdir}/pkgconfig/libudev.pc"
+ FILES_libgudev = "${base_libdir}/libgudev*.so.* ${libdir}/libgudev*.so.*"
+ FILES_libgudev-dbg = "${base_libdir}/.debug/libgudev*.so.*
${libdir}/.debug/libgudev*.so.*"
+ FILES_libgudev-dev = "${includedir}/gudev* ${libdir}/libgudev*.so
${libdir}/libgudev*.la \
${libdir}/libgudev*.a ${libdir}/pkgconfig/gudev*.pc"
Thanks
Wenzong
Cheers,
Richard
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
