On Fri, 2013-11-08 at 16:10 +0800, wenzong fan wrote: > On 11/07/2013 07:12 PM, Burton, Ross wrote: > > On 7 November 2013 11:03, <wenzong....@windriver.com> wrote: > >> From: Wenzong Fan <wenzong....@windriver.com> > >> > >> Just ship these sources to their own dbg packages instead of udev-dbg: > >> > >> libudev* -> libudev-dbg > >> gudev* -> libgudev-dbg > >> others -> udev-dbg > > > > Why do this? Multiple -dbg packages could make sense in a recipe > > which builds a multi-gigabyte -dbg package (such as webkit) but what's > > the rationale for doing this in udev? > > Actually I don't know clear about why it needs three -dbg packages, > looks they have been there since very early commits of udev. I suspect > that udev/libudev/libgudev are independent each other, so they are > shipped into different packages (base/-dev/-dbg). This patch only ships > their source code to -dbg packages accordingly.
We don't support multiple -dbg packages and this looks like an error. Cheers, Richard _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
