Why it does not make sense in my opinion is the fact that the many people would already need to do this right now. Yet, you prefer a few people (if any?) with only a very limited application set out of the 1000+, as it is only two which is affected?
I do not understand how the gun can be compared to the cannon. It is unfortunate you guys introduced regressions for those users, but I just do not have time to make everyone happy. I am not paid for this as a few in here. However, I still think making more users happy than less is a nice thing. On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 11:46 AM, Burton, Ross <ross.bur...@intel.com>wrote: > On 29 July 2013 11:42, Laszlo Papp <lp...@kde.org> wrote: > > you would cause a "runtime" issue which is pretty simple to fix > > Enabling rfkill would involve writing a bbappend and patching busybox, > when a PACKAGECONFIG would make everyone happy and configurable from > the distro. Even if we disagree on what the default value should be, > it should be a PACKAGECONFIG. > > Ross >
_______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
