Exactly, so you broke the update for the last two new versions on the *build* level.
Anyway, if you do not have any sympathy for older users, then I am very disappointed. After this change, the image will build just fine for the "new" people. Also, if you do not write a change on top of mine, it is probably not so important anyhow? On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 11:35 AM, Phil Blundell <p...@pbcl.net> wrote: > On Mon, 2013-07-29 at 11:22 +0100, Laszlo Papp wrote: > > I disagree. This change should not have gone in the first place > > causing the regression for the users. Please be consistent with the > > history. > > If this was a recent change then I would have some (limited) amount of > sympathy for your position. But the commit you are complaining about > has been in the tree for over a year, and it was presumably included in > at least one if not two of the most recent stable releases. > > p. > > > >
_______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core