On Mon, 2013-07-29 at 11:01 +0100, Laszlo Papp wrote: > No, that was intentional. That is why the change has been updated. > > > I can update the commit message if that is what you wish?
As a general rule yes, please always make sure that the commit message describes what the patch is actually doing. But in this particular case, your new patch seems to have more serious problems since it will cause rfkill to silently disappear for many people who do currently have it. If your distro selects a toolchain which doesn't contain the necessary bits to support rfkill then it seems as though the appropriate course of action would be to either: a) patch rfkill so that it does build with your headers; or b) introduce a PACKAGECONFIG option for busybox to turn off rfkill even if it would naturally default to on, and set this in your distro configuration; or c) just add your own .bbappend for busybox to do what you want. p. _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
