Op 9 apr. 2013, om 16:36 heeft Otavio Salvador <ota...@ossystems.com.br> het
volgende geschreven:
> On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 9:35 AM, Richard Purdie
> <richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>> On Mon, 2013-04-08 at 19:29 +0300, Radu Moisan wrote:
>>> Along with v182 upgrade udevd was moved to ${base_libdir}
>>> making scripts like init-live.sh to fail in finding udevd
>>>
>>> Fixes [Yocto #4046]
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Radu Moisan <radu.moi...@intel.com>
>>> ---
>>> meta/recipes-core/udev/udev.inc | 3 ++-
>>> meta/recipes-core/udev/udev_182.bb | 2 +-
>>> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> We needed a decision on this. I've rewritten the commit message and
>> merged it. Most of the feedback was about the commit message, not the
>> patch itself. There were also no better proposals for how we could
>> actually fix the bugs we were seeing.
>
> If I read the thread right, it had two NACK's. So it wasn't a cosmetic
> commit log issue.
4 replies to the patch:
1) me asking about the commit log
2) me NACK'ing the patch
3) Otavio NACK'ing the ptch
4) RP mentioning other discussions
So 25% of the replies are about cosmetics, how is that "most of the replies"?
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
