On 9/28/12 9:02 AM, Phil Blundell wrote:
On Fri, 2012-09-28 at 08:57 -0500, Mark Hatle wrote:
On 9/28/12 4:52 AM, Phil Blundell wrote:
On Mon, 2012-09-24 at 15:40 +0300, Andrei Dinu wrote:
On 09/24/2012 02:30 PM, Phil Blundell wrote:
On Mon, 2012-09-24 at 14:26 +0300, Andrei Dinu wrote:
+- *reloc_addr += sym->st_value;
++ *reloc_addr = sym->st_value;
That patch looks slightly dubious to me. Are you sure this doesn't
introduce any regressions elsewhere?
I have insufficient data to affirm that it doesn't introduces regressions.
Presumably it does at least pass the eglibc and binutils testsuites,
right?
That patch is a workaround for an ARM issue related to thread local storage and
TLS offsets during runtime and prelinking.
See https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1443
Note, this is simply a workaround and not a final solution as it hasn't been
vetted upstream.
Right, I understand that. But this doesn't really answer the question
"does the workaround break anything else?".
In my testing no. But I never integrated it with OE, so I never ran the test
suite Khem was referring to.
--Mark
p.
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
