On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 6:57 AM, Mark Hatle <mark.ha...@windriver.com> wrote: > On 9/28/12 4:52 AM, Phil Blundell wrote: >> >> On Mon, 2012-09-24 at 15:40 +0300, Andrei Dinu wrote: >>> >>> On 09/24/2012 02:30 PM, Phil Blundell wrote: >>>> >>>> On Mon, 2012-09-24 at 14:26 +0300, Andrei Dinu wrote: >>>>> >>>>> +- *reloc_addr += sym->st_value; >>>>> ++ *reloc_addr = sym->st_value; >>>> >>>> That patch looks slightly dubious to me. Are you sure this doesn't >>>> introduce any regressions elsewhere? >>>> >>>> >>> I have insufficient data to affirm that it doesn't introduces >>> regressions. >> >> >> Presumably it does at least pass the eglibc and binutils testsuites, >> right? > > > That patch is a workaround for an ARM issue related to thread local storage > and TLS offsets during runtime and prelinking. > > See https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1443 > > Note, this is simply a workaround and not a final solution as it hasn't been > vetted upstream.
Thats ok however we do have infra to run eglibc testsuite in cross env so if that was done would have answered Phil's question http://sakrah.dontexist.org/?p=6 > > --Mark > > >> p. >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Openembedded-core mailing list >> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org >> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-core mailing list > Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
