On Fri, 2012-09-28 at 08:57 -0500, Mark Hatle wrote: > On 9/28/12 4:52 AM, Phil Blundell wrote: > > On Mon, 2012-09-24 at 15:40 +0300, Andrei Dinu wrote: > >> On 09/24/2012 02:30 PM, Phil Blundell wrote: > >>> On Mon, 2012-09-24 at 14:26 +0300, Andrei Dinu wrote: > >>>> +- *reloc_addr += sym->st_value; > >>>> ++ *reloc_addr = sym->st_value; > >>> That patch looks slightly dubious to me. Are you sure this doesn't > >>> introduce any regressions elsewhere? > >>> > >> I have insufficient data to affirm that it doesn't introduces regressions. > > > > Presumably it does at least pass the eglibc and binutils testsuites, > > right? > > That patch is a workaround for an ARM issue related to thread local storage > and > TLS offsets during runtime and prelinking. > > See https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1443 > > Note, this is simply a workaround and not a final solution as it hasn't been > vetted upstream.
Right, I understand that. But this doesn't really answer the question "does the workaround break anything else?". p. _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
