On 03/15/2012 12:23 AM, Martin Jansa wrote:
* also use weak assignment for SDK_NAME_PREFIX as suggested by khem
* TUNE_PKGARCH is not 100% right too, because such SDK image usually has few
machine specific packages included (e.g. base-files, securetty, opkg configs)
but those are not important for SDK users so it's better to have one SDK for
whole e.g. armv7a-vfp-neon then 6 SDK for each machine which would work the
same.
You can see diff between crespo and om-gta04 SDK here:
http://build.shr-project.org/shr-core/sdk/oecore-i686-armv7a-vfp-neon-toolchain-efl-crespo-om-gta04.diff
Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa<martin.ja...@gmail.com>
---
meta/conf/bitbake.conf | 4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/meta/conf/bitbake.conf b/meta/conf/bitbake.conf
index 216da75..01fc52a 100644
--- a/meta/conf/bitbake.conf
+++ b/meta/conf/bitbake.conf
@@ -365,8 +365,8 @@ PKGDATA_DIR = "${TMPDIR}/pkgdata/${MULTIMACH_TARGET_SYS}"
# SDK variables,
##################################################################
-SDK_NAME_PREFIX = "oecore"
-SDK_NAME = "${SDK_NAME_PREFIX}-${SDK_ARCH}-${TARGET_ARCH}"
+SDK_NAME_PREFIX ?= "oecore"
+SDK_NAME = "${SDK_NAME_PREFIX}-${SDK_ARCH}-${TUNE_PKGARCH}"
SDKPATH = "/usr/local/${SDK_NAME_PREFIX}-${SDK_ARCH}"
SDKPATHNATIVE = "${SDKPATH}/sysroots/${SDK_SYS}"
Merged into OE-Core
Thanks
Sau!
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
