On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 04:33:33PM +0000, McClintock Matthew-B29882 wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 10:32 AM, Matthew McClintock <m...@freescale.com> 
> wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 12:48 AM, Martin Jansa <martin.ja...@gmail.com> 
> > wrote:
> >> * also use weak assignment for SDK_NAME_PREFIX as suggested by khem
> >> * PACKAGE_ARCH is not 100% right too, because such SDK image usually has 
> >> few
> >>  machine specific packages included (e.g. base-files, securetty, opkg 
> >> configs)
> >>  but those are not important for SDK users so it's better to have one SDK 
> >> for
> >>  whole e.g. armv7a-vfp-neon then 6 SDK for each machine which would work 
> >> the
> >>  same.
> >>  You can see diff between crespo and om-gta04 SDK here:
> >>  http://build.shr-project.org/shr-core-staging/031/sdk/oecore-i686-armv7a-vfp-neon-toolchain-efl-crespo-om-gta04.diff
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa <martin.ja...@gmail.com>
> >> ---
> >>  meta/conf/bitbake.conf |    4 ++--
> >>  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/meta/conf/bitbake.conf b/meta/conf/bitbake.conf
> >> index 87bb71c..91f8397 100644
> >> --- a/meta/conf/bitbake.conf
> >> +++ b/meta/conf/bitbake.conf
> >> @@ -364,8 +364,8 @@ PKGDATA_DIR = 
> >> "${TMPDIR}/pkgdata/${MULTIMACH_TARGET_SYS}"
> >>  # SDK variables,
> >>  ##################################################################
> >>
> >> -SDK_NAME_PREFIX = "oecore"
> >> -SDK_NAME = "${SDK_NAME_PREFIX}-${SDK_ARCH}-${TARGET_ARCH}"
> >> +SDK_NAME_PREFIX ?= "oecore"
> >> +SDK_NAME = "${SDK_NAME_PREFIX}-${SDK_ARCH}-${PACKAGE_ARCH}"
> >
> > Why PACKAGE_ARCH over TUNE_ARCH?
> 
> Or rather TUNE_PKGARCH?

In 
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2012-March/018543.html
I've said:

"And we should change TARGET_ARCH in SDK_NAME to PACKAGE_ARCH or TUNE_PKGARCH"

So why TUNE_ARCH/TUNE_PKGARCH over PACKAGE_ARCH?

I don't see the advantage, but if there is some I'll update it in v2.

Cheers,
-- 
Martin 'JaMa' Jansa     jabber: martin.ja...@gmail.com

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

Reply via email to