On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 12:48 AM, Martin Jansa <martin.ja...@gmail.com> wrote: > * also use weak assignment for SDK_NAME_PREFIX as suggested by khem > * PACKAGE_ARCH is not 100% right too, because such SDK image usually has few > machine specific packages included (e.g. base-files, securetty, opkg configs) > but those are not important for SDK users so it's better to have one SDK for > whole e.g. armv7a-vfp-neon then 6 SDK for each machine which would work the > same. > You can see diff between crespo and om-gta04 SDK here: > http://build.shr-project.org/shr-core-staging/031/sdk/oecore-i686-armv7a-vfp-neon-toolchain-efl-crespo-om-gta04.diff > > Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa <martin.ja...@gmail.com> > --- > meta/conf/bitbake.conf | 4 ++-- > 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/meta/conf/bitbake.conf b/meta/conf/bitbake.conf > index 87bb71c..91f8397 100644 > --- a/meta/conf/bitbake.conf > +++ b/meta/conf/bitbake.conf > @@ -364,8 +364,8 @@ PKGDATA_DIR = "${TMPDIR}/pkgdata/${MULTIMACH_TARGET_SYS}" > # SDK variables, > ################################################################## > > -SDK_NAME_PREFIX = "oecore" > -SDK_NAME = "${SDK_NAME_PREFIX}-${SDK_ARCH}-${TARGET_ARCH}" > +SDK_NAME_PREFIX ?= "oecore" > +SDK_NAME = "${SDK_NAME_PREFIX}-${SDK_ARCH}-${PACKAGE_ARCH}"
Why PACKAGE_ARCH over TUNE_ARCH? -M _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
