On Wed, 9 Jun 2021 at 13:37, Richard Purdie < richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> Thanks Michael and Alex. We can therefore pretty safely say that something > was > broken between the 240 and 305 of the centos8 kernel for the 32 bit syscall > utimensat syscalls. > > I did poke around https://github.com/kernelim/linux/tree/centos8 which > does > have a kernel diff but it is huge and you have to clone the repo to get it. > > git show a3342908613ba72a84f652ca7a56c3e2113bda12 | grep sys_utimensat -C > 40 > > shows they did add the syscalls in that kernel. > > So this does look to be a RedHat issue. Not sure if we want to report it > to them? Can we run the autobuilders on the older kernel for now until > they hopefully fix it? > Centos 8 will be discontinued in just over 6 months ( https://www.centos.org/centos-linux/) so I think at least one of the centos 8 workers should be updated to centos stream 8 (https://www.centos.org/centos-stream/ - includes instructions) and take it from there. Alex
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#152808): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/152808 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/83304703/21656 Group Owner: openembedded-core+ow...@lists.openembedded.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
