On Mon, 23 Sep 2013 09:19:07 +0200 Christof Hanke <[email protected]> wrote:
> [added release-team] > > On Sun, 22 Sep 2013 23:42:55 -0500 > Andrew Deason <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Sun, 22 Sep 2013 17:51:40 -0700 > > Russ Allbery <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > What would people think if I submitted a patch to OpenAFS to rename up > > > to afs-up and backup to afs-backup? Would that break a bunch of > > > critical software? It would be really nice to fix AFS's camping on > > > obvious namespace. > > > > Would it be appropriate to also have an optional compat package that > > could symlink the original names? > > > yes, I think so. > Thing is, for SuSE I renamed scout to afs_scout. > I'm not sure if RedHat/SL did some similar renaming > (probaly using yet another scheme for it) > Actually I found on SL6: /usr/bin/pagsh.openafs, so we have now afs-* afs_* and *.openafs as renaming-schemes... > So, on possible solution is to > fix the renaming on gerrit. > Then the packagers can create their own compatibility packages for this, > since they are sure of the future binary-names. > > > > > Either way, sure, makes sense to me. But the people that actually use > > those commands really do need to say something, even if it's just "yes, > > sounds good". > > > > _______________________________________________ > OpenAFS-info mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-info mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
