Russ, I would like to hear from sites that actively use these commands.
That said my personal opinion is that they should be renamed in the next major release. (Not 1.6.x). I have no objection to separate packaging. Jeffrey Altman On 9/22/2013 8:51 PM, Russ Allbery wrote: > In the Debian packaging for OpenAFS, I've renamed the "up" command to > "afs-up" for years now. There's now also a conflict with the "backup" > command (which is a horrible name for a command), and I'm rather tempted > to do the same thing, but since it's a whole command suite with multiple > documentation pages and cross-references, it's more of an undertaking. > > What would people think if I submitted a patch to OpenAFS to rename up to > afs-up and backup to afs-backup? Would that break a bunch of critical > software? It would be really nice to fix AFS's camping on obvious > namespace. > > Failing that, I'm probably going to split butc, backup, and fms into a > separate package to make it easier for other packages to conflict with it > due to the poorly-chosen command name instead of conflicting with all of > openafs-client. >
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
