On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 6:51 PM, Russ Allbery <[email protected]> wrote: > In the Debian packaging for OpenAFS, I've renamed the "up" command to > "afs-up" for years now. There's now also a conflict with the "backup" > command (which is a horrible name for a command), and I'm rather tempted > to do the same thing, but since it's a whole command suite with multiple > documentation pages and cross-references, it's more of an undertaking. > > What would people think if I submitted a patch to OpenAFS to rename up to > afs-up and backup to afs-backup? Would that break a bunch of critical > software? It would be really nice to fix AFS's camping on obvious > namespace.
There is an open bug regarding the "backup" command name: https://rt.central.org/rt/Ticket/Display.html?id=130621&user=guest&pass=guest At the time, the conclusion was to rename the command "afsbackup". I completely agree that it should be renamed. - Ken _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-info mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
