> On March 11, 2017, 5:03 p.m., Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > Which compiler are you using that gives you those warnings? > > Miklós Máté wrote: > 3 months ago I think I used gcc 5.something. Currently I have gcc 6.3, > and it doesn't issue a warning for the dvi generator. Yay for fewer false > positives.
Ok, i'll discard this then. - Albert ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/129286/#review102792 ----------------------------------------------------------- On Oct. 30, 2016, 2:29 p.m., Miklós Máté wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/129286/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Oct. 30, 2016, 2:29 p.m.) > > > Review request for Okular. > > > Repository: okular > > > Description > ------- > > The one in the DVI generator is a maybe-unused warning, but it's a false > positive, because there were no unhandled enum values. > > > Diffs > ----- > > generators/dvi/generator_dvi.cpp d1536cc > ui/pageview.cpp bb540cb > ui/presentationwidget.cpp e6ecdc5 > > Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/129286/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > > Thanks, > > Miklós Máté > >
