> On Nov. 24, 2015, 10:52 nachm., Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > > Reason: it expects the dialog to have a KLineEdit member with object name > > > 'name'. > > > > Who does expect that?
The unit test 'editdrawingtooldialogtest', originally written by Laurent Montel, committed by Tobias König in 81f80ac3a4c7211fb0a8cd89dc8da27f6e47780e . If setting the object name is not the correct fix please give me a few hints on what the correct fix really is, and I'll try to update my patch. - Oliver ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/126158/#review88777 ----------------------------------------------------------- On Nov. 24, 2015, 7:39 nachm., Oliver Sander wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/126158/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Nov. 24, 2015, 7:39 nachm.) > > > Review request for Okular. > > > Repository: okular > > > Description > ------- > > The unit test 'editdrawingtooldialogtest' on the frameworks branch aborts at > run-time. Reason: it expects the dialog to have a KLineEdit member with > object name 'name'. That KLineEdit does exist in the dialog, but no object > name is set for it at all. This patch explicitly sets the object name to > 'name', which makes the editdrawingtooldialogtest pass again. > > > Diffs > ----- > > conf/editdrawingtooldialog.cpp bcd65e1 > > Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/126158/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > > Thanks, > > Oliver Sander > >
_______________________________________________ Okular-devel mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/okular-devel
